🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."